Back to the Future in Iran?

Sep 02, 2023 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    26% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    25% ReliablePoor

  • Policy Leaning

    26% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -12% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

56% : With very few exceptions, most observers have heralded the election results as a triumph for the cause of moderation and reform in Iran.
48% :Indeed, the Hope List succeeded in electing more moderate principlists in place of hardliners in Tehran, where a substantial number of seats are apportioned.
46% : This election was as much a referendum on the nuclear deal as it was about the future course of politics in Iran.
38% : In many respects, Rouhani's successes on the diplomatic front are the result of a careful study of missed opportunities and management of contentious politics inside Iran.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link