The HillBiden Fed pick faces GOP fire on climate stances
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-38% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-30% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : Raskin, an Obama-era Fed governor and deputy Treasury secretary, would be in charge of the Fed's supervision and regulation of the banking system if confirmed by the Senate.48% : Raskin disputed the question's premise, saying her op-ed focused on how the Fed should run a specific relief program created by Congress and had nothing to do with its ongoing supervision and regulation of major banks.
46% : Neely KennedyLouisiana Democrat running for US Senate smokes marijuana in campaign ad MORE
29% : Joseph ToomeyConservatives are outraged that Sarah Bloom Raskin actually believes in capitalism Meet Washington's most ineffective senator:
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.