Biggest Transatlantic Loser in Trump's Victory: Britain's Labour Government

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

57% : In July, he told the BBC, "Donald Trump has the thickest of skins," and observed that his running mate, Sen. JD Vance, whom he'd met several times, had used some pretty choice language about Trump in the past.
55% : In 2017, Theresa May, then prime minister, planned a state visit for Trump.
55% : With the U.S. Senate in Republican hands, Trump might well go a step further than what he did in his first term, and send the agreement -- a treaty in all but name -- to the Senate for its advice and consent, as required by the Constitution.
52% : In June 2019, during the Conservative Party's leadership election, Starmer posted: "An endorsement from Donald Trump tells you everything you need to know about what is wrong with Boris Johnson's politics and why he isn't fit to be Prime Minister."In 2017, Wes Streeting, now Starmer's health secretary, tweeted: "Trump is such an odious, sad, little man.
44% : "Yes, if Trump comes to the U.K. I will be out protesting on the streets," Lammy tweeted.
35% : Streeting's insult was aimed not only at Trump but also at Americans.
28% : This puts the Labour Party on a collision course with Trump and his pledge to pull out of the Paris climate agreement.
25% : "In an August interview with The Spectator (its new editor, Michael Gove, endorsed Harris as "the lesser of two evils"), Woody Johnson, Trump's ambassador to the Court of St. James in his first term, described Lammy's description of Trump as a "neo-Nazi-sympathizing sociopath" as "not a wise comment.
21% : On the day Americans were voting for Trump and the return of American energy dominance, Miliband was giving Starmer's Cabinet a bleak picture of climate change.
17% : "In an unhinged rant denouncing the visit, Lammy also condemned Trump for his "shameful behavior on the international stage.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.