Boris Johnson's false claim had 'lasting impact' on dual-national held in Iran
- Bias Rating
-82% Very Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
82% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-31% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
44% : Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe finally returned home in March along with a fellow dual national, after Britain agreed to pay a longstanding debt to Iran.40% :Zaghari-Ratcliffe also raised with Johnson the case of Morad Tahbaz, an environmental campaigner still jailed in Iran.
38% : A British-Iranian woman freed after six years' imprisonment in Tehran rebuked Prime Minister Boris Johnson in person on Friday after his loose language was used against her by the Islamic regime.
35% : Downing Street declined to give an account of the "private" meeting but ahead of it, Johnson's spokesman said all blame for Zaghari-Ratcliffe's ordeal lay with Iran.
34% :Zaghari-Ratcliffe further pressed the plight of two French nationals newly detained in Iran, and an Iranian-Swedish academic who is on death row for alleged espionage.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.