Boycott Texas

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

55% : If Texas wants its citizens to cash in on anti-abortion sentiment, they shouldn't expect the rest of us to pay for it.
50% : Maybe people were blindsided for the moment -- up until the last minute, it wasn't unreasonable to assume the Supreme Court would intervene, since that's what it has done before with laws that flagrantly violate Roe v Wade, and this one in particular is so unprecedented in leaving enforcement entirely to private citizens.
47% : They know anti-abortion activists are watching them, just waiting for an opportunity to cash in on the minimum $10,000 reward for a successful suit, all the while driving the clinic out of business.
46% : Roe v Wade may be almost half a century old, and abortion may be widely practiced -- indeed, it's basic to contemporary American life -- but the stigma is still there, for both the procedure and the women who use it.
41% : Now it is virtually impossible, because the law is to be enforced by private citizens bringing civil suits against those who "aid and abet" abortion, and clinics are ceasing abortion provision.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.