Bruised Supreme Court Returns to Bench With Possible Election Cases Looming
- Bias Rating
12% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
14% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-58% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-4% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : The case, Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, No. 23-1122, concerns a Texas law that seeks to limit minors' access to sexual materials on the internet by requiring age verification measures like the submission of government-issued IDs.50% : On the morning after Election Day, the court will consider Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank, No. 23-980, a securities class action over whether Facebook had adequately disclosed a data breach that allowed Cambridge Analytica to harvest the private information of millions of users.
48% : "The biggest case of the term so far is United States v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477, a challenge to a Tennessee law that bans some medical treatments for transgender minors.
47% : On Tuesday, the court will hear a broadly similar case, Garland v. VanDerStok, No. 23-852, again asking whether the A.T.F. overreached.
47% : In asking the Supreme Court to hear the case, Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, No. 23-1038, the agency's lawyers cited another appeals court that had reached the opposite conclusion.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.