Bulls-eye Biden should admit his violent talk is partly why Trump got...

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

56% : No, what was more important to 'Mr Nice Guy' Biden was that he score instant political points to infer that Trump had it coming.
39% : When it comes to Trump, all liberal rhetorical bets have been off for a long time which is ironic given the biggest problem most of his critics on the left have with him is his own incendiary rhetorical language and the way he speaks about people.
31% : The Democrats announced they were suspending a hateful $50 million advertising campaign attacking Trump, following the assassination attempt.
30% : We don't yet know the shooter's motives, but we do know he wanted Trump dead.
23% : Not least when your side has spent eight years screaming that Trump is the new Adolf Hitler whose Nazi regime murdered 12 million people including six million Jews in the Holocaust, and incessantly, and hysterically, branded him a 'fascist' and 'dictator' and 'tyrant' and just about every other ludicrously exaggerated, and offensive label they can hurl at him.
13% : In response to Holt's 'soul-searching' question, Biden just went on the attack against Trump again, even justifying the violent words he used about him while simultaneously denying he ever said them.
7% : As fork-tongued Biden ranted, yet again, about January 6, and then about how Trump - disgracefully - mocked Nancy Pelosi's husband when he was hit with a hammer by an intruder, Holt intervened, again, to say what we were all thinking: 'This doesn't sound like you're turning down the heat, though?'Entirely unsurprisingly, this merely promoted Biden to go off once more at Trump for election-denial and packing the Supreme Court with conservative judges etc.
6% : To his credit, Holt was having none of it, and pointed out that just days before the shooting, Biden declared Trump an 'existential threat' to America and told donors: 'It's time to put Trump in the bull's-eye.'

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.