The Guardian Article RatingCanada is on fire, and big oil is the arsonist | Tzeporah Berman
- Bias Rating
-52% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-62% Medium Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
14% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : Wealthy fossil-fuel producing countries like Canada must support countries in the global south to be part of the transition to clean energy so it can happen in a fast and fair way.58% : Plans that include protections and support for communities and workers dependent on oil, gas and coal.
44% : The Paris agreement doesn't even include the words fossil fuels, oil, gas or coal.
44% : And today we are on track to produce 110% more oil, gas and coal by 2030 than the world can ever burn, or it will burn us.
42% : We can now measure which oil companies are responsible for wildfires (13 operate in Canada), but oil executives are still calling the shots.
37% : Oil, gas and coal are burning us.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.