Financial Times Article RatingChina playing 'long-game' as it co-opts UK assets, warns MI5 chief
- Bias Rating
-50% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
1% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
41% :McCallum said the agency was alive to the risk of alignment between China, Russia and Iran, and that they amplify strengths by "loaning players to each other".37% :Delivering his annual threat assessment on Wednesday, Ken McCallum said MI5 was making "the biggest shifts in a generation" as it faced state adversaries in China, Russia and Iran, who were not "squeamish about the tactics they deploy".
37% : Iran, which he considered "the state actor which most frequently crosses into terrorism", projects a direct threat to UK security, he said.
31% : There had been at least 10 such threats by Iran since January.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.