Los Angeles Times Article RatingColumn: The case against Donald Trump is clear. Here's the case for Kamala Harris
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-28% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
23% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
31% : Here are six reasons Harris would be a better president:She has promised to seek consensus and compromise, two words Trump has rarely uttered.24% : The most basic case for Vice President Kamala Harris, then, is that her election would protect our democracy from the damage Trump would do.
14% : "Harris' economic policies are less likely to produce runaway inflation and deficits than Trump's.
11% : Harris' 21-year record in elected office -- more experience than Trump or Barack Obama had -- solves this non-riddle: She's always been a center-left pragmatist, not a progressive ideologue.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.