Los Angeles Times Article Rating

Column: Trump and Vance are angry about fact-checking at the debates. Here's what voters think

Oct 06, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    75% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -38% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-22% Negative

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

45% : ""But the people on television say their dog was eaten by the people that went there," Trump insisted in the course of a rant that launched a kajillion memes.
26% : In any case, Muir didn't just have a journalistic obligation to call Trump on his race-baiting lie.
24% : In the first and only vice presidential debate last week, Ohio Sen. JD Vance picked up where Trump left off, blaming "illegal" immigrants in places such as Springfield for overwhelming schools and hospitals and driving up the price of real estate.
23% : "The F-word, by the way, is apparently Kelly's go-to response in defense of Trump.
19% : Kelly, who herself famously tangled with Trump as a debate moderator for Fox News, also once insisted that Santa Claus cannot possibly be Black because he "just is white.
16% : "Once Project 2025's radical plan to overhaul the executive branch became widely known and the public reacted negatively, Trump pretended as if he'd never heard of it.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link