Washington Post Article Rating

Column | Vance used past GOP climate inaction to argue for climate inaction

  • Bias Rating

    -12% Somewhat Liberal

  • Reliability

    70% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -26% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

48% : During Obama's first term, though, the fossil-fuel industry -- a central driver of carbon dioxide emissions -- began leaning on its political allies to slow the embrace of technologies like electric vehicles, wind turbines and solar panels.
45% : He suggested that it be stipulated, just for the sake of argument, that carbon dioxide emissions are driving increased warming, which is a bit like stipulating that a dropped object will fall toward the Earth.
38% : Trump has long responded to questions about climate change by talking, instead, about the environment broadly and about his purported passion for clear air and water (despite his administration rolling back protections for those things) -- to the point that it was reasonable to ask whether he knew what climate change actually entailed.
10% : "He also twisted the knife a bit, noting that Trump had in the past referred to climate change as a "hoax" and that Trump had welcomed oil-industry executives to Mar-a-Lago, where he suggested that a $1 billion contribution to boost his campaign would result in a fossil fuel-friendly president.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link