Covid Inquiry: Sunak defends Eat Out to Help Out scheme
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
55% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-6% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : "Rishi Sunak has defended not consulting scientists or the Secretary of State for Health over his Eat Out to Help Out scheme in 2020.48% : In relation to non-pharmaceutical interventions such as lockdowns he said that "we could have had a broader conversation from the beginning about some of these things".
47% : When questioned about the Treasury's concerns related to over-compliance with the Government's stay-at-home messaging, Mr Sunak said the public had not understood "sufficiently clearly that they should go to work only if they could not work from home...?"The Prime Minister said there was work to get Government communications "right" on the topic after the first lockdown.Rishi Sunak has repeated the argument that ministers were "following advice from the scientists" during the Covid crisis.
47% : "I think it's important, and this is always tricky in public policy, is many of these impacts are not felt immediately, they're felt over time, and that is always a tough thing to deal with when you're communicating, but as it turned out we were able to borrow what we needed to fund the pandemic response.
43% : "Mr Sunak said that others in government had the chance to raise concerns about the scheme but never did.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.