Financial Times Article RatingDemocrats splash out on ads while JD Vance asks Peter Thiel for cash
- Bias Rating
-6% Center
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
30% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
8% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
72% : Harris was leading Trump by 3.7 percentage points nationally, according to the FT's election polling average.59% : Jennifer Garland, a 46-year-old mother of five boys, said Trump was a much better representative for those in the room than Harris.
42% : I definitely think I'm going to get more parental rights out of Trump than anyone else at the moment.
38% : Harris has a significant lead among women voters (an ABC News/Ipsos poll from the weekend gave her a 13-point advantage) but Trump is still trying to court them.
6% : Trump and Vance need to build up their war chest as they struggle to mount effective attacks on Harris, and the Republicans have been particularly reliant on cheques from megadonors to fill their coffers.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.