Reason Article Rating

Department of State v. Munoz: The Sleeper ConLaw Case of the Term

  • Bias Rating

    32% Somewhat Conservative

  • Reliability

    60% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    38% Somewhat Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -42% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

57% : (emphasis added); see also 2 Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, p. 238 (M. Farrand ed.
42% : Barrett wrote that in Trump, the Court "assume[d] without deciding that [the] plaintiffs' statutory claims [were] reviewable."
32% : Trump v. Hawaii is not to the contrary.
32% : Should Trump prevail, his Justice Department would rely on non-reviewability to defeat a host of immigration-related challenges.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link