Details Emerge in Alleged Assassination Attempt on Former President Trump
- Bias Rating
56% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
5% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
86% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-42% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-20% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : Investigators found a handwritten list of dates and locations where Trump was expected to appear.50% : On September 15, a Secret Service agent noticed the barrel of a rifle poking out from the foliage near the sixth green of Trump International Golf Club, where Trump was playing golf.
36% : Routh, who was allegedly positioned 300 to 500 yards from Trump, fled upon detection and was later apprehended by law enforcement.
21% : In a self-published book, Routh suggested that Iran should feel "free to assassinate Trump," showcasing his extreme discontent with the former president.
5% : He explicitly criticized Trump's 2018 decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran, blaming Trump for deteriorating U.S.-Iran relations.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.