Did a unanimous SCOTUS deliver a victory for religious expression today?
- Bias Rating
40% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
48% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
84% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : Christianity Today called the unanimous ruling in Groff v USPS a "victory for religious liberty," quoting Gerald Groff's attorneys at First Liberty:58% : The real stakes for religious liberty are in 303 Creative.
44% : The Supreme Court's decision in Groff also doesn't relate to "religious liberty," at least not directly.
44% : That's a lot better than a punt for the plaintiff, but it's not an outright W for him or for religious liberty.
41% : The decision in question did not come from today's 6-3 ruling in SFFA v Harvard that overturned affirmative action.
39% : That decision will come tomorrow, and NBC News speculated yesterday that Neil Gorsuch may write the controlling opinion:Neil Gorsuch may be the author of 303 Creative v. Elenis, the case about a Christian woman who doesn't want to make wedding websites for same-sex couples (though no one asked her to do so).
35% : In fact, one has to wonder whether Gorsuch -- the most small-L libertarian of the justices -- might not want to address the broader speech implications of public-access law and regulation, which could be just as much of a bombshell as SFFA v Harvard will prove to be.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.