End of the Line for the New Jersey Machine?
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-13% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : That doctor, Dr. Munr Kazmir, happens to also be a contributor to both Menendez Sr. and Jr.'s campaigns.56% : Bhalla is championing Medicare for All, while Menendez calls for a more generic expansion of access to health care.
49% : More from Luke GoldsteinThe prosecution against Menendez Sr. exposed a pay-to-play culture that has been associated with New Jersey politics for some time.
49% : MENENDEZ JR. TOOK HEAT WELL BEFORE charges were announced against Menendez Sr. last fall for accepting bribes from an Egyptian halal meat tycoon and other business interests in exchange for pushing their policy preferences.
43% : (Menendez Sr. has reportedly filed enough signatures to run for re-election as an independent, though that is mostly seen as a bargaining chip in a potential plea deal.)
40% : There are other policy differences over issues like Medicare for All, but for the most part the race isn't neatly ideological.
35% : That case ended up with a hung jury, thanks in large part to the Supreme Court's narrowing of the definition of public corruption.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.