Financial Times Article RatingEU plan for buying key commodities centrally is over-reach, warn tech groups
- Bias Rating
-16% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-16% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-9% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : The bloc is hoping to emulate its use of a platform called Aggregate EU, run by software company Prisma, which sold 42bn cubic metres of gas last year.54% : EU officials have said the commission could request to take over the running of the platform even earlier.
48% : Commodity trading platforms have lashed out at EU proposals to centralise the purchase of natural gas, hydrogen and critical minerals for being bureaucratic over-reach that will make the bloc a commercial competitor.
46% : The criticisms are the starkest yet of EU efforts to aggregate demand for commodities in the hope of pushing prices down and jump-starting nascent or localised markets, in the way the bloc managed successfully for Covid-19 vaccines.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.