Fact check: Harris claims top bankers prefer her economic policy to Trump's
- Bias Rating
36% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
4% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
12% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
67% : "The FactsFollowing a Goldman Sachs report published two weeks ago, there was media coverage suggesting that the U.S. economy would get a boost from a Kamala Harris victory, but that proposed increased import tariffs and immigration curbs under Trump would harm economic output.54% : The VP also made bold claims about her plans (and Trump's) for the U.S. economy.
48% : "We estimate that if Trump wins in a sweep or with divided government, the hit to growth from tariffs and tighter immigration policy would outweigh the positive fiscal impulse, resulting in a peak hit to GDP growth of -0.5pp in 2025H2 that abates in 2026," the note read.
47% : The model suggested that under Trump, GDP "eventually falls relative to current law, falling by 0.4 percent in 2034 and by 2.1 percent in 30 years".
38% : The business school reference concerns a Penn Wharton Budget Model which found that Harris's tax and spending proposals would increase primary deficits, which limit a government's ability to manage the economy, less than the proposals from Trump.
36% : "That report which was mentioned [at the debate between Harris and Trump] came from an independent analyst," Solomon said, speaking to CNBC.
23% : Newsweek has contacted the Harris and Trump campaigns, and Goldman Sachs and The Warton Business School, for comment.
19% : Primary deficits would increase more under Trump, the report noted, but while low and middle-income households would fare better under Harris, the wealthiest 5% of families would "fare worse".
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.