The Epoch Times Article Rating

Federal Judge Rules Rep. Scott Perry Can't Keep 1,600 Communications Sought in Jan. 6 Investigation

Dec 20, 2023 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    62% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    25% ReliablePoor

  • Policy Leaning

    44% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -51% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

24% Positive

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

40% : The judge ruled that Mr. Perry has no privilege over records, including discussions about newsletters and press releases outside the legislative sphere; discussions of efforts to work with the executive branch and state legislators to counter alleged election fraud or otherwise influence those individuals; discussions of press releases, communications about alleged election fraud; and discussions of lawsuits and other non-legislative efforts to contest instances of alleged election fraud.
21% : On the other hand, the judge ruled Mr. Perry has no privilege over communications in which he shared evidence of alleged fraud in the 2020 election with individuals outside of the federal government; discussed non-legislative methods to combat the alleged fraud; discussed then-Vice President Mike Pence's obligations under the Electoral Count Act; and discussed the breach at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.Of Mr. Perry's communications to staff and other members of Congress, the judge ruled he had privilege over discussions of legislative proceedings; discussions about election fraud, whether he should certify electoral votes from the 2020 election, and information relating to legislation about election procedures ahead of Congress's vote to certify the 2020 election; discussions with fellow members of the House Freedom Caucus, and about other matters of business before the House of Representatives.
21% : On the other hand, the judge ruled Mr. Perry has no privilege over discussions of non-legislative efforts to contest alleged election fraud; efforts to influence the actions of members of the executive branch dealing with alleged election fraud; and discussions of the procedures that then-Vice President Pence must follow under the Electoral Count Act.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link