Federal officials sent Taliban ally to US amid evacuation chaos, audit shows

Sep 08, 2022 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    6% Center

  • Reliability

    N/AN/A

  • Policy Leaning

    -8% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -31% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

N/A

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

57% : "The evacuee initially cleared vetting at the lily pad, and 3 months after being paroled into the United States, CBP obtained derogatory information from the FBI.
53% :"CBP did not always have critical data to properly screen, vet, or inspect Afghan evacuees arriving as part of OAR/OAW," DHS inspector general investigators concluded in a Sept. 6 memorandum.
53% : According to ICE, at the time of our audit, the individual was undergoing removal proceedings.
49% :"CBP paroled another evacuee into the United States who posed national security concerns," the report reads.
42% : The State Department and the Department of Homeland Security established a vetting process, but the chaos of the evacuation under the eyes of the reconquering Taliban presented a difficult task for Customs and Border Protection officials.
42% : CBP also admitted or paroled evacuees who were not fully vetted into the United States."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link