Five takeaways from House Democrats' 'minibus' spending bills
- Bias Rating
68% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-80% Very Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
12% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
67% : ABORTION GETS A BOOST61% : The Department of Energy section of the bill increases the amount of funding for renewable energy programs by $906 million over last year, for example.
54% : The language in the funding bill would "restore grant funding to Planned Parenthood" and similar organizations, according to the House Appropriations Committee.
54% : Nonprofit groups run most charter schools, but some are operated by private companies.
54% : More than 1,100 for-profit charter schools are spread across 26 states and the District of Columbia, according to the Network for Public Education.
51% : The Department of Education appropriations bill would slash funding for certain charter schools -- schools that are privately operated but receive public funding and are subject to fewer regulations than public schools.
51% : "The bill includes new language preventing Federal funds from being awarded to charter schools run by for-profit entities," the House Appropriations Committee said in a summary of the legislation.
43% : Opponents of charter schools argue they can take money and resources away from traditional public schools, while supporters say they can offer more opportunities for children trapped in struggling public school systems.
38% : SOME CHARTER SCHOOLS COULD LOSE FUNDING
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.