For many leading conservatives, 'Never Trump' didn't mean never - The Boston Globe
- Bias Rating
38% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-46% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
25% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : As Trump conquered the Republican Party, the party gradually remade itself in his image -- and high-ranking Republican officials found it in their interest to do likewise.39% : Similarly, I have no trouble understanding that there are single-issue voters who find Trump unlikable but strongly supported him all the same because of his stand on the particular issue that matters most to them -- immigration, judicial appointments, Israel, trade, whatever.
35% : What explains it?The nearly universal self-justification for these reversals is that while Trump is surely a flawed man, he is a good leader and the nation needs him, and their previous hostility to him was misguided.
34% : Nor am I faulting erstwhile Republican critics who opposed Trump at first because they were backing a different candidate (or who were themselves among those candidates).
34% : When those who claimed to oppose Trump as a matter of principle switched sides, did it cost them anything to do so?
31% : Why?To be clear, I am not questioning any Republicans, prominent or not, who might have initially opposed Trump in the belief that he was not a viable candidate and then changed their minds when they realized differently.
31% : Much of this was purely cynical -- think of the Republican members of Congress who were ready to wash their hands of Trump immediately after the Capitol riot, only to rally around him when it was clear that his popularity among the Republican rank and file had not suffered.
27% : By the same token, I respect the many people who never liked Trump but held their noses to vote for him because they sincerely believed the alternative was worse.
25% : Individuals like the high-profile radio host Glenn Beck, for example, who in 2016 told his huge audience that Trump was "an immoral man who is absent decency or dignity" and that opposing him was the only "moral, ethical choice."
18% : It has baffled me to see so many prominent opinion leaders and public intellectuals on the right -- men and women who used to call Trump out for his ugly character, odious words, compulsive lying, and reckless demagoguery -- eventually pledge him their troth.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.