Former Obama Advisor Says Democrats Are Too Confident, 'Very Possible' Trump 'Would Win' Election If It Was Held Today
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-28% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
6% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-3% Negative
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
73% : The podcaster himself argued it is "very possible" that Trump would win the election over Harris if it were held today.63% : "I think it's very possible that if the election were held today, Trump would win," he said.
49% : Trump meanwhile led Georgia, Arizona, and North Carolina.
48% : A YouGov poll released this week, in coordination with The Times and SAY24, found Trump and Harris essentially tied in battleground states.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.