Four takeaways from former Rep. Matt Gaetz's exit as Trump attorney general pick
- Bias Rating
-40% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
20% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-47% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
12% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : Some have gone as far as to suggest it's time to just give Trump pretty much whatever he wants, including his Cabinet picks.55% : It's also a sign that institutions - or at least a few members of them - can still stand up to Trump, and a remarkably swift conclusion to what could be a series of tussles between Trump and his own party.
46% : Trump has also signaled he'll push his political and policy norm-breaking quite a bit further than in his first term.
44% : But just because this was predictable doesn't mean it's not bad for Trump.
43% : Related Gaetz withdraws as Trump's pick for attorney generalBoth Gaetz and Trump in social media posts claimed that Gaetz was doing well but had become a "distraction" - a PR word that often gets bandied about in untenable circumstances.
39% : But regardless, this is an early signal that institutions - whether Republican senators, the legal and ethics systems, and/or the media - can still provide a significant check on Trump, if they are so inclined.
38% : And seeing Republican senators give lukewarm quotes about him and choose to fight against him more privately doesn't exactly suggest they feel empowered to publicly stand up to Trump.
33% : WHAT IT MEANS FOR TRUMP'S OTHER PICKSWhen Trump picked Gaetz last week, theories abounded about how maybe this wasn't all that it seemed - that it wasn't truly about getting Gaetz installed as attorney general.
28% : Trump chose to spend some of his earliest post-election political capital on this fight, daring Republican senators to defy him just a week after his election.
28% : A handful of senators with reservations about Gaetz is far from the entire Senate, even as the opposition was apparently enough to make him and Trump think twice about moving forward.
24% : It was a sizable early setback for Trump, just more than two weeks after his triumphant 2024 election win.
18% : It would be one thing if Republicans fought over Gaetz for months, and Trump supporters were able to send a strong signal that opposing Trump would come with a cost (including public attacks and primaries).
11% : That there was apparently nobody around Trump willing or able to caution him against Gaetz doesn't augur well for what lies ahead.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.