Gold Fields sees growth from new mines as it pivots to Americas
- Bias Rating
6% Center
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
6% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : The partnership with Osisko Mining offers new opportunities to search for deposits in areas adjacent to the Windfall project, ensuring Gold Fields' presence in Canada for "a long time", Preece said.53% : The Canadian project, being jointly developed with Osisko Mining (OSK.TO), offers Gold Fields a renewed push into Canada's mining sector even after it failed to bag Yamana, Preece said.
38% : While the gold miner founded by Cecil John Rhodes in 1887 still runs South Deep operation in South Africa, mining in the country has become more difficult as the geological challenges of extracting bullion from the world's deepest deposits are worsened by severe power outages and crime.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.