Haitian group in Springfield, Ohio, files citizen criminal charges...
- Bias Rating
46% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-72% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-42% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
29% : "So, really, the only question is whether the court and then the prosecutors would treat Trump and Vance the way anyone else would be treated.23% : The filing asks the Clark County Municipal Court to affirm that there is probable cause and to either refer the case for further investigation or to issue arrest warrants against Trump and Vance.
20% : "Chandra said the U.S. Supreme Court's July ruling granting ex-presidents broad immunity from criminal prosecution doesn't apply in this case because Trump is currently a private citizen and Vance did not amplify the rumors that members of Springfield's 15,000-member Haitian community were eating people's pets in his capacity as a senator.
19% : Specifically, the affidavit alleges Trump and Vance: - Disrupted public service "by causing widespread bomb and other threats that resulted in massive disruptions" to Springfield's public services;- Made false alarms "by knowingly causing alarm in the Springfield community by continuing to repeat lies that state and local officials have said were false";- Committed telecommunications harassment "by spreading claims they know to be false during the presidential debate, campaign rallies, nationally televised interviews, and social media";- Committed aggravated menacing "by knowingly making intimidating statements with the intent to abuse, threaten, or harass the recipients, including Trump´s threat to deport immigrants who are here legally to Venezuela, a land they have never known";- Committed aggravated menacing "by knowingly causing others to falsely believe that members of Springfield´s Haitian community would cause serious physical harm to the person or property of others in Springfield;" and- Violated the prohibition against complicity "by conspiring with one another and spreading vicious lies that caused innocent parties to be parties to their various crimes."
16% : The leader of a nonprofit representing the Haitian community of Springfield, Ohio, filed criminal charges Tuesday against former President Donald Trump and his running mate, JD Vance, over the chaos and threats experienced by the city since Trump first spread false claims about legal immigrants there during a presidential debate.
16% : "If it were anyone else other than Trump and Vance who had done what they´ve done - wreak havoc on Springfield, resulting in bomb threats, evacuated and closed government buildings and schools, threats to the mayor and his family - they would have been arrested by now," Chandra said.
13% : Trump and Vance, a U.S. senator from Ohio, are charged with disrupting public services, making false alarms, telecommunications harassment, aggravated menacing and complicity.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.