Harris' Michigan loss highlights Democrats' many weak spots

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

63% : Trump won 21% and Harris 20%.
59% : Both Green Party candidate Jill Stein and Trump spent considerable time in Dearborn, the biggest U.S. city with a majority-Arab population.
50% : Dearborn backed Trump by 42% to Harris' 40%, with Stein receiving over 15%, city data showed.
41% : Working class voters, people of color and immigrants voted in lower numbers or moved to Trump, high grocery and housing prices loomed large, and national party leaders ignored local organizers.
40% : "We were better off when President Trump was president," said Goddard, who attended two rallies with Trump and his running mate JD Vance before the election.
35% : Isaiah Goddard, 24, a white UAW member, said he met Trump when he visited a non-union shop during the strike.
18% : Trump's campaign blasted text messages and mailers to a list of 100,000 mostly Democratic-leaning Arab Americans in Michigan in the last months, portraying Trump as a "president of peace" and linking Harris with the wars in the Middle East and Ukraine.
18% : The campaign also failed to address concerns including around electric vehicles that were raised by many United Auto Workers, a growing number of whom backed Trump even though Biden and Harris supported their strike last year against General Motors.
17% : Michigan result underlines issues facing party nationwide*80,000 votes fewer than Trump vs. Biden's 150,000-vote gain*Arab and Muslim Americans turned to Trump and SteinBy Andrea ShalalDEARBORN, Michigan, Nov 10 (Reuters) - Democrat Kamala Harris lost Michigan by more than 80,000 votes amid a nationwide shift to Republicans, as union workers, Black voters, Arab Americans and Muslims either failed to show up at the polls, or cast their ballots for Donald Trump.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.