Harris returns to the site of Trump's Jan. 6 rally to make her closing argument

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

67% : Trump won the 2016 election and gladly accepted the results.
51% : "There was a phenomenon of taking Trump seriously but not literally," Fallon said echoing a line that became a mantra after Trump's 2016 win.
44% : Kelly had been White House chief of staff to Trump and said his former boss, in private, even praised Hitler and his generals.
39% : Lotter said he sees Harris' warnings as a desperation move - a scare tactic - because Harris hasn't been able to convince undecided voters she would be better for them than Trump.
35% : "I'm just fearful of the rhetoric I hear from Trump.
32% : "Warnings about Trump are persuasive to women swing voters, and are mobilizing for women and Democratic men, Lake said.
28% : But as the race wore on and polls showed it tightening, Harris has increasingly leaned on the dangers of electing Trump -- a candidate she argues is "unhinged and unstable.
27% : But now, Fallon argues it's different - because Trump refused to accept his loss in 2020, and still hasn't.
24% : Hillary Clinton also issued dire warnings in the closing days of her 2016 campaign, reminding voters that in a debate, Trump had refused to say he would accept the results of the election.
20% : Harris is set to argue that Trump, if elected, will continue to focus on himself and his growing list of personal enemies, citing his own increasingly inflammatory closing arguments.
15% : "Harris elevated dire warnings about Trump as she campaigned with former GOP Rep. Liz Cheney, trying to peel off moderate Republicans and independents appalled by what had happened on Jan. 6.
7% : Last week, she agreed that Trump is a "fascist" after the New York Times released interviews with retired Marine Gen. John Kelly making that same charge.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.