Thank you for following The Guardian. You will receive email notifications for this source. To make changes to this, please visit your account.
You need to upgrade in order to follow more news source and receive email notifications about new articles and ratings, as your subscription allows only source. To change which news sources you follow, please visit your account.
Here's the real reason the EPA doesn't want to test for toxins in East Palestine | Stephen Lester
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
60% : Clearly the situation in East Palestine is the place where EPA should follow its mission and do right by the people who live in this town. 51% : EPA must test the soil in East Palestine for dioxins. 38% : So why is EPA unwilling to test for dioxins in the soil?
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
The Guardian