Hey, SCOTUS -- the right to life trumps the right to own a gun
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : The First Amendment, for example, protects the right to shout "fire," but not in a crowded theater in which people could be trampled.49% : While the Second Amendment recognized a "right to keep and bear arms," for over 200 years that was understood to only protect state armies -- "a well-regulated militia" -- from federal infringement.
49% : On June 26, 2008, a 5-4 majority in District of Columbia v. Heller held that the Second Amendment provides citizens with a right to possess handguns to use in private self-defense.
48% : The Inter-American Court for Human Rights and the United Nations are addressing the human rights implications of U.S. gun policy amid growing concern in the international community.
39% : More significantly, the court promulgated a new test which prohibits gun laws that do not have sufficient historical precedent.
39% : The consequence of not allowing strong gun laws is more deaths and injuries from gunfire.
33% : Governments may not sit idly by while their people are slaughtered, whether that slaughter is caused by roving criminals or loose gun laws.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.