Financial Times Article RatingHong Kong passes tough new security law
- Bias Rating
4% Center
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
2% Center
- Politician Portrayal
26% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
25% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : In a chorus of support, the pro-Beijing lawmakers said at Tuesday's session that the law was needed to counter foreign espionage and ensure stability in the city.44% : "There are reasons to be worried," said John Burns, honorary professor of politics and public administration at the University of Hong Kong.
44% : "It can be difficult to say for sure whether a piece of [information] involves state secrets for auditors," especially when it comes to state-owned enterprises, said a Hong Kong-based executive at an international auditing firm.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.