How Kamala Harris Plowed Through $1 Billion and Still Lost to Donald Trump

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : Instead, these voters associated Trump with the strong pre-COVID economy, and gave him a pass for what happened during the pandemic.
53% : And from July 22 to Election Day, Harris and her associated committees outspent Trump and his backers on advertising by a margin of $654 million to $378 million.
38% : Harris reportedly spent $56.6 million on staffing, while Trump spent just $9 million on a much smaller team.
34% : Harris, based on filings, disclosed spending $880 million on the election by mid-October, more than double the $354 million disclosed by Trump, according to The Washington Examiner.
25% : "There was a segment of the electorate that was very consistently saying, 'I'm not familiar with Kamala Harris,' and, because of that, 'I'm not comfortable enough to decide to vote for her,' where as Trump is incredibly well-defined," said Jake Dilemani.
21% : Specifically, these voters didn't hold Trump accountable for economic woes of 2020 or the Supreme Court decision that overturned Roe v. Wade -- even as Trump has frequently taken credit for the latter.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.