The Guardian Article RatingHow 9/11 led the US to forever wars, eroded rights - and insurrection
- Bias Rating
-8% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-58% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
65% : In 2005, it carried out 1,300 raids against businesses employing undocumented immigrants; the next year there were 44,000.42% : The first head of the bureau of immigration and customs enforcement (Ice) under DHS oversight was a federal prosecutor, Michael Garcia, who hailed the arbitrary roundup of immigrants from Muslim countries after 9/11 as an "exercise in disruption".
41% : Ice used the counter-terrorist urgency of the DHS's founding to step up its drive against mostly Latin American immigrants.
31% : That fabricated link between terrorism and immigration was the driving force between Donald Trump's election campaign, the "Muslim ban" he ordered on taking office and his fixation on building a wall on the southern border.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.