How high school policy debate predicted the culture wars
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-15% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
64% : Central is a bad school, but the policy debate program is a rare bright spot, affording black students the opportunity to compete (and often win) against elite public and private schools on the national circuit.48% : Enclosed within were reams of files on every imaginable topic: capitalism, arguments for and against U.S. hegemony, the internal politics of the Chinese Politburo, renewable energy, the case for de-growth, the philosophy of Michel Foucault.
39% : Students argued against race-based critiques on the grounds they exempted capitalism, the real root cause of society's ills.
30% : Last September, the ACLU followed suit, producing a bowdlerized version of a well-known Ruth Bader Ginsburg quote about abortion: "The decision whether or not to bear a child is central to a [person's] life, to [their] well-being and dignity ...
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.