If Twitter Had Competent Legal Staff, This Gag Order Over A Warrant On Trump's Account Might Have Been Interesting, Instead...

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

56% : Although the company did not question the validity of the search warrant, it asserted that the nondisclosure order was facially invalid under the First Amendment.
55% : Adopting Twitter' s requested approach would "invite intervention by Twitter - let alone every other electronic communications provider - to delay execution of any [warrant] ... issued under the [Act]" while it litigated challenges based on "slivers of knowledge" of an investigation's scope.
50% : In an oral ruling, the court rejected Twitter's argument that the First Amendment required adjudication of the nondisclosure order before enforcement of the warrant.
45% : First, having your portal for law enforcement to submit warrants "inoperative" is not great, but even worse is apparently not actually checking the inbox for it until a week later when the DOJ contacts you about where you are in the process.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.