
Immunity brief aims to shield Trump case from SCOTUS ruling
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-47% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
13% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : She set two more deadlines, ordering Smith to reply by Nov. 21, and Trump to reply again by Dec. 5.50% : Chutkan now must balance Smith's refined legal case with a 180-page opposition brief she ordered Trump to file by Nov. 7.
45% : In his new brief, Smith argues he can prove at trial that Trump was acting in his personal capacity as a political candidate.
45% : Trump, after all, could order his new Justice Department to drop Smith's charges entirely if he wins.
43% : " That framing is an important distinction by Smith, as he attempts to shield four criminal charges brought against Trump in a recent superseding indictment from the high court's ruling that such a prosecution cannot infringe on the office of the presidency. Smith asserts he has a mountain of evidence a jury could consider -- even if U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, or eventually the justices, find certain alleged conduct cuts too closely to his duties of the president.
40% : Whether Trump faces a jury -- at earliest in 2026 -- is likely entirely dependent on the results of the looming Nov. 5 election.
39% : Unless there is any evidence of Trump mixing his efforts to pressure the officials with conversations about something within his official purview -- federal funding for highways, for example -- there would be no reason to deem the acts as official.
19% : But Smith argues that the overwhelming majority of Trump's comments were personal or clearly made as a political candidate -- including those in which he spurred violence at the Capitol riot after Pence refused to hand Trump the election.
16% : Smith, however, argued that the conversations -- in which Trump tried to pressure Pence to certify a false slate of electors on Jan. 6, 2021 -- centered on Pence's role as president of the Senate during the certification, a process Trump would have no role in.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.