Washington Examiner Article RatingIn allowing coach to pray, Supreme Court says First Amendment doesn't contradict itself
- Bias Rating
6% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
6% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-35% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : The school district claimed that the First Amendment required it to ignore his rights and fire him because someone might have seen him kneel and might have thought the school district approved of this.49% : The lower courts treated them that way only by relying on the Supreme Court's 1971 decision in Lemon v. Kurtzman , which invited judges to explore the purpose and effect of government actions, as well as make subjective judgments about "excessive entanglement" between government and religion.
46% :The First Amendment to the Constitution has two connected clauses on religion, one prohibiting an "establishment of religion" and the other protecting the "free exercise thereof."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.