Independent Journalist Tells Supreme Court Some Research Labs Have Racial Quotas for Aborted Baby Body Parts

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

55% : The brief was prepared by the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund in partnership with the Thomas More Society, the Chicago-based public interest law firm that specializes in religious liberty cases.
43% : The brief argued Roe should be overruled because the Court in the decision incorrectly claimed that most states retained until after the Civil War the English Common Law standard of "quickening" -- the first moment an expectant mother feels her unborn baby moving -- as the time after which abortion was illegal.
41% : They were also sued in civil court by Planned Parenthood.
39% : The More brief noted that, "By the end of 1849, 18 of the 30 states had enacted statutes prohibiting abortion, and by the end of the Civil War, 27 of the 36 states had done so.
38% : The state has also encouraged the High Court to reverse its 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide.
36% : "Yet, due to this Court's antiquated, 1900s-era abortion precedents, absent laws like Mississippi's, unborn-victims-of-violence laws do not protect the very same unborn victims from the violence of predatory businesses that operate with the explicit purposes of killing them by abortion and selling them for experimentation."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.