Is abortion content absent from your Facebook feed? You aren't alone
- Bias Rating
-12% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
67% : In 2020, anti-abortion group the Susan B. Anthony List claimed that a political advertisement it paid to run on the platform was blocked because it contained information that was determined to be false by third-party fact-checkers.59% : Facebook has taken heat for removing anti-abortion content, too.
51% : A post containing the word abortion received just three likes, he said.
51% : Three years ago, Facebook drew ire when it decided to take down an accurate fact check correcting misinformation about abortion after anti-abortion groups complained about it.
50% : Moseson explained that, as she understands it, Facebook has at times "viewed ads related to abortion as 'political,' rather than healthcare or research as intended."
48% : Distraught, frustrated people used social media to share personal experiences about abortion, voice their opinions, and share other related content about abortion access across the country.
47% : Now: Single Payer and What Comes Next, tweeted that he had "zero abortion content in my Facebook newsfeed" despite being friends with several people who work at abortion clinics who made posts about abortion access.
46% :Numerous users commented that while platforms like Twitter appeared to have constant conversation about abortion in the wake of the leaked draft, including discussions about accessing abortion services should the federal protections granted by Roe be taken away, Facebook users said those conversations were absent.
46% : Another post with similar content but with the word "abortion" censored got 22.
43% : Anecdotally, he said that he also saw less engagement than expected when he posted about abortion on Facebook.
43% : But while responses to the original Politico article that broke the news may have been plentiful, it was just a drop in the bucket of posts made about the decision and about abortion.
39% : The organization said it has not been monitoring activity about content with terms related to abortion, although Nicholson noted they have "not noticed anything out of the ordinary."
33% : She also noted that during their research, they did not come across any participants who made any claims that information about abortion was being suppressed on the platform.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.