The Independent Article Rating

It took nearly 90 minutes, but Tim Walz made clear exactly why Trump chose JD Vance

Oct 02, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    38% Somewhat Conservative

  • Reliability

    25% ReliablePoor

  • Policy Leaning

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -1% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-6% Negative

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

41% : ""Walz scored highly standing up for the Constitution, and Vance tanked defending Trump," they said.
38% : He gave the Minnesota governor an opening to point out that the only reason that the Ohioan was present on the debate stage in the first place is because the last person to share a ticket with Donald Trump -- former vice president Mike Pence -- isn't running again because Trump disavowed him after sending an angry mob of his supporters to the Capitol to lynch him.
36% : Vance's entire reason for being on the GOP ticket is because Trump needed a new running-mate -- and because his previous one has refused to endorse him and has continuously called him unfit to serve as president.
22% : "Whether Trump lost the election, Walz said was "not a debate," because he had lost the election.
9% : Walz responded with a question, asking Vance directly if Trump had indeed lost the 2020 election.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link