It took nearly 90 minutes, but Tim Walz made clear exactly why Trump chose JD Vance
- Bias Rating
38% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
25% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-1% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-6% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
41% : ""Walz scored highly standing up for the Constitution, and Vance tanked defending Trump," they said.38% : He gave the Minnesota governor an opening to point out that the only reason that the Ohioan was present on the debate stage in the first place is because the last person to share a ticket with Donald Trump -- former vice president Mike Pence -- isn't running again because Trump disavowed him after sending an angry mob of his supporters to the Capitol to lynch him.
36% : Vance's entire reason for being on the GOP ticket is because Trump needed a new running-mate -- and because his previous one has refused to endorse him and has continuously called him unfit to serve as president.
22% : "Whether Trump lost the election, Walz said was "not a debate," because he had lost the election.
9% : Walz responded with a question, asking Vance directly if Trump had indeed lost the 2020 election.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.