Jack Smith's devastating response to Judge Cannon's jury order

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

40% : Recall that the appeals court already smacked her down -- twice -- over her handling of litigation before Trump was charged.
38% : Of course, the question of how a trial proceeds is an academic one until Cannon sets a firm trial date -- assuming Trump doesn't win the presidential election in November, which would give him the power to eliminate the case entirely.
33% : As a refresher, Cannon asked the parties to file proposed jury instructions, regarding the federal charges alleging that Trump illegally retained national defense information.
33% : So injecting the issue into the trial could lead the jury to think that Trump could do whatever he wanted with classified documents, which would obviously go against the criminal law that says otherwise.
24% : ""The PRA's distinction between personal and presidential records has no bearing on whether a former President's possession of documents containing national defense information is authorized under the Espionage Act," the special counsel added, referring to the criminal law under which Trump is charged with unlawful retention.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.