Check out this free eBook to learn more about detecting misinformation in the news.
JD Vance Might Lose Michigan For Trump
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-22% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
11% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Medium Conservative
50%
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : Â JD Vance was picked to help Trump run up the score with Republican voters.48% : It is clear that Harris made a better pick with Walz than Trump did with Vance.
29% : Three percent said it made them less likely to vote for Trump.
24% : JD Vance isn't helping Trump and may cost Republicans the state of Michigan.
20% : Asked whether Trump's selection of Vance made them more likely to back Trump, 14% said it did so, with 19% saying it made their backing of him less likely and 65% saying it had no bearing on their decision.
17% : JD Vance was put on Trump's ticket to help in the blue wall states, but a new Michigan poll shows that Vance is much less popular than Tim Walz and could cost Trump the state.
15% : When the election changed after Kamala Harris entered the race, Trump was stuck with a running mate that seemed to have negative appeal and repel swing voters.
14% : Vance is clearly not helping Trump, and he might be doing harm to the ticket with undecided voters.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.


Check out this free eBook to learn more about detecting misinformation in the news.