Joe and Mika's Trip to Reconnect With Trump At Mar-a-Lago Backfires Spectacularly -- For Very Good Reasons

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

79% : Political media is a transactional world, and the economic relationship between Morning Joe and Trump just got a lot more mutually beneficial.
59% : The only question that remains is if the co-host's new and potentially damaged reputation among many of its viewers is worth the audience and respect of Trump itself.
58% : The MSNBC morning show hosts explained how they wanted to "restart communications" and that it was "time for a new approach" in covering the once and future Commander-in-chief, which was something of a brave, if perhaps too candid admission that their past seven years of warning about Trump -- often with shouting and even tears -- wasn't serious.
53% : Will people tune into Morning Joe for a kinder, gentler review of Trump?
52% : So while Trump's surrogates are delighted to dunk on Scarborough and Brzezinski's conversion from Saul to Paul, I'm willing to bet dollars to donuts that Trump respects it more than anyone else.
36% : To be fair, their concerns were founded on the public insights shared by decorated military generals like Mark Milley, former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman, and John Kelly, who worked directly with Trump as his White House Chief of Staff.
22% : Now, I don't personally believe their meeting with Trump at Mar-a-Lago is ridiculous.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.