Judge keeps RICO case in place as he tosses 2 Trump charges, but a footnote is revealing
- Bias Rating
Center
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
36% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-64% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-17% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
30% : The Georgia judge presiding over the 2020 election subversion case against Donald Trump and his allies dismissed two charges against the former president on Thursday while leaving the top RICO count untouched, but a footnote emphasizing the issues that decision "does not reach" shows a much larger fight looms large.Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee, who previously tossed out other charges, made his latest ruling on the motions of co-defendants John Eastman and Shawn Still, decided that three counts (14, 15, and 27), two of which Trump faced, had to be "quashed" because the "United States Supreme Court's decision of In re Loney, 134 U.S. 372 (1890) preempts the State's ability to prosecute perjury and false filings in a federal district court[.]"At the same time, the judge wrote that the "indictment is not barred entirely" by the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, since the "subject" of the charges is not "so inseparably connected to the functioning of the national government[.]"Some legal commentators reacted to the ruling by either opining that McAfee was either "probably right" or may not have been but ruled on an issue where legal experts can reasonably disagree, but they emphasized the RICO case as a whole has thus far been upheld.19% : "A footnote from the judge pointed out, however, that there is still a fight lingering in the background, an issue that McAfee has not yet ruled on in light of Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court immunity case that has complicated each of Trump's three other criminal cases.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.