Judge set to rule on whether to scrap Trump's conviction in hush money case - The Boston Globe

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

56% : Trump, by then in the White House, signed most of the checks himself.
51% : The case centered on how Trump accounted for reimbursing his personal attorney for the Daniels payment.
47% : Trump has been fighting for months to overturn the verdict and could now seek to leverage his status as president-elect.
41% : Trump was a private citizen -- campaigning for president, but neither elected nor sworn in -- when Cohen paid Daniels in October 2016.
37% : The payout was to buy her silence about claims that she had sex with Trump.
33% : A jury convicted Trump in May of falsifying business records related to a $130,000 payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels in 2016.
10% : Trump said that Cohen was legitimately paid for legal services, and that Daniels' story was suppressed to avoid embarrassing Trump's family, not to influence the electorate.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.