Judge finds Kim Davis violated the rights of same-sex couples
- Bias Rating
6% Center
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
76% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-21% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
43% : Davis, an elected county official who was tasked by her constituents to manage marriage licensing in Rowan County, could not exclude same-sex couples from civil marriage," Bunning wrote.41% : Davis who was then the Rowan County Clerk, refused to comply with the Supreme Court decision and directed her employees to not issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
41% :"The explicit holding in Obergefell was that states could not exclude same-sex couples from civil marriage.
40% : The matter began in June of 2015 after the United States Supreme Court handed down the landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges in which they ruled that same-sex couples could no longer be denied the right to get legally married.
36% : Former Kentucky clerk Kim Davis violated the rights of two same-sex couples when she denied them marriage licenses according to a federal judge's ruling on Friday.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.