Yahoo Article Rating

Judge Rips Into Michael Cohen For Bank Fraud Trial 'Perjury'

Mar 20, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    8% Center

  • Reliability

    70% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -61% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-40% Negative

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

34% : Trump Officially Appealing $464 Million Bank Fraud JudgmentIn calling Cohen's testimony "perjury," the federal judge went much further than New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur F. Engoron did at the bank fraud trial, where the state judge found that Cohen's testimony about Trump's finances were indeed credible.
28% : (Never mind that Cohen took the fall for helping Trump cover up a hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels, a case the feds didn't pursue against the former president.)
27% : Manhattan prosecutors are relying heavily on Cohen to explain how Trump used him to funnel a $130,000 hush money payment to Daniels in a hurried attempt to keep her from exposing their 2006 one-night stand in the closing days of the 2016 presidential election.
25% : At that bank fraud trial, Cohen tried to distance himself from his past crimes -- an effort that would strengthen his testimony as New York Attorney General Letitia James tried to use him as a witness against Trump to prove that the businessman routinely fabricated personal financial statements.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link