Judge's lawfare campaign against Trump condemned as 'bad detective fiction' * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

48% : The Supreme Court pointed that out when it confirmed Trump does have various levels of immunity at different times, and it sent the case back to Chutkan.Smith, appointed by Merrick Garland's Department of Justice to carry out this arm of the lawfare that has been assembled against Trump, submitted his claims now that Trump was a "private" individual for all regards concerning his re-election.
42% : And by Smith's light, hopefully get Trump convicted in the run-up to the election in hopes of influencing the outcome of the election.
42% : Conversations that other people had that are not connected to Trump directly.
39% : Nothing has changed, the theme that Trump deceived people, well, if he honestly believed he won, it's hard to prove otherwise.
37% : So, I think this was done knowing full well media and Democrats would seize on provocative details, publicize it to affect voters and damage Trump and sure enough, as I looked at television, the internet and newspapers, that's what's happening.
33% : Even so, Democrats have claimed those who have doubts are "insurrectionists," leftist judges have used those thoughts against those who trespassed at the Capitol in Washington on January 6, 2021, and extremists like Colorado's secretary of state, Jena Griswold, even have campaigned to ban Trump from the ballot over the issue.
24% : Article III Project founder Mike Davis explained, on Chutkan's newest "lawfare" against Trump.
23% : "Yeah, he's trying to have a damning trial of Trump without a trial in the face of the fact that he couldn't get a trial before the election.
18% : "He called for Trump, if president in January 2025, to have the DOJ "fully investigate this criminal conspiracy against rights.
17% : The motion came about because Chutkan, in a hurry to try make the most of the attack on Trump, ruled earlier that Trump had no immunity for his actions as president.
13% : It was Tanya Chutkan, who is hearing Smith's claims that it was criminal for Trump to disbelieve and challenge the 2020 count, who unsealed Smith's 165-page "immunity motion" "to do the maximum damage to Trump before the election.
5% : "WND has reported a federal judge in Washington, who has established her own bias by repeatedly and publicly criticizing and condemning Trump, has taken Jack Smith's edited claims against Trump regarding the 2020 election and shoved them at voters just in time for Democrats to use them in their campaign against him.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.